|
Recommendations
by
Health
Organizations for pulse consumption
by
Leterme P.*[1] [*][1]Universidad Nacional de
Colombia, Departamento de Ciencia animal, A.A.
237 Palmira, (Valle) Colombia
The
present paper aims to study why and how health
organizations recommend the consumption of
pulses such as beans, chickpeas or lentils.
Although it is recognized that frequent pulse
consumption may reduce serum cholesterol levels
and helps reduce risks of coronary heart disease
and diabetes, these advantages are scarcely
mentioned by health-promoting associations, i.e.
vegetarians and organizations helping people to
reduce the risks for chronic diseases. Pulses,
especially common beans, are rather considered
as whole grains that provide plenty of proteins,
starch, dietary fibres, minerals and vitamins.
Many organizations refer to the food guide
pyramid to advise their members, and place beans
either in the third part, together with meat, in
the second one with fruits and vegetables, or in
the bottom part with starchy foods. Whatever
their place, they have acquired the status of
staple food for anyone who wants to eat a
healthy diet.
Overview
of the market and consumption of pulses in
Europe
by
Schneider A.V.C.*[1]
[*][1]AEP, European Association for Grain
Legume Research, Executive Secretariat, 12
Avenue George V, 75008 Paris, France
The
human consumption of grain legumes and pulses in
Europe and the EU is lower than in other regions
of the world. However, there is a lot of
variation between countries and an overall
slight increase has been observed in recent
years. The major trends in the EU pulse market
are illustrated here with a specific focus on
Spain, France and the UK, which account for
about 60 % of the EU pulse consumption. The ways
in which pulses are consumed are very different
in the various EU countries, due to different
regional food habits and traditions, and to
differences in the supplies of grain legumes and
the markets. Canned products dominate pulse
sales compared with dry pulses sold in packets.
Dry beans are the most consumed of the pulses in
the EU, but the preference between species
varies according to country. The factors
limiting the consumption of pulses in the EU are
mainly: an inadequate level of innovation for
developing products adapted to modern life, a
small home supply of pulses and competition from
cheaper low-quality imports. Recently, however,
consumers are favouring healthy and balanced
vegetable diets. Pulses have significant
nutritional and health advantages for consumers
and their cultivation has a positive impact on
agriculture and the environment. Therefore the
trend in the consumption of pulses could change,
especially if publicity about the benefits of
pulses is improved and if the food industry and
professional organizations take up the challenge
to incorporate grain legumes in novel,
convenient and healthy food products.
Factors
influencing pulse consumption in Latin America
by
Leterme P.*[1]; Carmenza Muñoz L.[2]
[*][1]Universidad Nacional de Colombia,
Departamento de Ciencia animal, A.A. 237 Palmira
(Valle) Colombia [2]CIAT, Departamento de
Biotecnología, A.A. 6713 Cali (Valle), Colombia
In
Latin America, pulse consumption ranges from 1
kg/capita per year (Argentina) to 25 kg/capita
per year (Nicaragua). Common beans account for
87 % of the total. The differences between
countries, regions or groups of population
within the same country can be explained by the
following factors: (1) beans are very nutritious;
(2) beans and maize are traditional foods and
the habit of consuming them is deeply rooted in
many people and communities; (3) the rural
population eats more pulses than the urban
population, due to geographical constraints that
limit exchanges and favour consumption of
locally produced foods; (4) income level, beans
are still the poor man's meat; and (5) other
factors, such as consumers' taste, the
constraints on cooking beans, etc. The evolution
of the consumption level in the future will
depend on the urbanization of the population,
access to processed foods and income level.
Health issues would be an argument for
maintaining or increasing the current
consumption level.
Health
benefits of low glycaemic index foods, such as
pulses, in diabetic patients and healthy
individuals
by
Rizkalla S.W.[1]; Bellisle F.[1]; Slama G.*[1]
[*][1]Department of Diabetes, INSERM U341
and Assistance Publique, Hôtel-Dieu, 1, Place
du Parvis Notre-Dame, 75004 Paris, France
The
present paper covers the health benefits of low
glycaemic index foods, such as pulses.
Nutritional factors potentially play a crucial
role in health and disease. A low-fat,
high-carbohydrate diet is often recommended as a
part of a healthy life-style. Historical works
have shown that carbohydrate foods differ in
their ability to affect post-ingestive glycaemia.
The glycaemic index concept allows a ranking of
carbohydrate-rich foods in terms of their blood
glucose raising potential. Pulses are foods with
very low glycaemic index values. Numerous
studies have documented the health benefits that
can be obtained by selecting foods of low
glycaemic index. These benefits are of crucial
importance in the dietary treatment of diabetes
mellitus: glycaemic control is improved as well
as several metabolic parameters, such as blood
lipids. The results of human studies have been
confirmed by animal experiments in the field of
diabetes. Diets with low glycaemic index value
improve the prevention of coronary heart disease
in diabetic and healthy subjects. In obese or
overweight individuals, low-glycaemic index
meals increase satiety and facilitate the
control of food intake. Selecting low glycaemic
index foods has also demonstrated benefits for
healthy persons in terms of post-prandial
glucose and lipid metabolism. Several public
health organizations have recently integrated
consideration of the glycaemic index in their
nutritional recommendations for patients with
metabolic diseases and for the general
population.
Pulses
and lipaemia, short- and long-term effect:
Potential in the prevention of cardiovascular
disease
by
Anderson J.W.*[1]; Major A.W.[1]
[*][1]Metabolic Research Group,VA Medical
Center and University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY,
40506-2142, USA
Cardiovascular
disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in
most developed countries. Most CVD deaths are
preventable through life-style measures such as
diet, exercise and avoidance of cigarette
smoking. Decreased intake of saturated fat and
cholesterol and increased intake of
cholesterol-reducing foods, such as pulses,
deserve a high priority for activities designed
to prevent CVD. Epidemiological and
observational studies indicate that habitual
intakes of large amounts of dietary fibre or of
vegetables are associated with significantly
lower rates of CVD. Studies over four decades
document the hypocholesterolaemic effect of
pulses and soyabeans. We performed a
meta-analysis of eleven clinical trials that
examined the effects of pulses (not including
soyabeans) on serum lipoproteins. Intake of
non-soya pulses was associated with these
changes: fasting serum cholesterol, -7·2 %, 95
% CI -5·8, -8·6 %; LDL–cholesterol, -6·2 %,
95 % CI -2·8, -9·5 %; HDL–cholesterol, +2·6
%, 95 % CI +6·3, -1·0 %; triacylglycerols, -16·6
%, 95 % CI -11·8 %, -21·5 %; and body weight,
-0·9 %, 95 % CI +2·2 %, -4·1 %. The
hypocholesterolaemic effects of pulses appear
related, in estimated order of importance, to
these factors: soluble dietary fibre, vegetable
protein, oligosaccharides, isoflavones,
phospholipids and fatty acids, saponins and
other factors. Intake of pulses may also reduce
risk for CVD by favourable effects on blood
pressure, glycaemia and risk for diabetes, and
risk for obesity. Overall, the available
evidence indicates that regular consumption of
pulses may have important protective effects on
risk for CVD.
Pulses
and carcinogenesis: potential for the prevention
of colon, breast and other cancers
by
Mathers J.C.*[1]
[*][1]Human Nutrition Research Centre,
Department of Biological and Nutritional
Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle,
upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Consumption
of pulses as components of healthy diets is
encouraged because it is believed that this is
likely to help in reducing the risk of common
non-communicable diseases, including cancers.
However, the evidence base for the role of
pulses in prevention of cancers is unconvincing
because of the difficulties, using conventional
epidemiological tools, in ascertaining the
quantitative contribution made by pulses to
cancer risk. Advances in understanding of the
biological basis of cancer and of the mechanisms
of action of cancer-preventing compounds offer
new insights into the role of food-derived
substances and of diet–gene interactions in
modulating cancer risk. Pulses contain a rich
variety of compounds which, if consumed in
sufficient quantities, may help to reduce tumour
risk.
Bioavailability
of minerals in legumes
by
Sandberg A-S.*[1]
[*][1]Department of Food Science,
Chalmers University of Technology, PO Box 5401,
SE 402 29 Göteborg, Sweden
The
mineral content of legumes is generally high,
but the bioavailability is poor due to the
presence of phytate, which is a main inhibitor
of Fe and Zn absorption. Some legumes also
contain considerable amounts of Fe-binding
polyphenols inhibiting Fe absorption.
Furthermore, soya protein per se has an
inhibiting effect on Fe absorption. Efficient
removal of phytate, and probably also
polyphenols, can be obtained by enzymatic
degradation during food processing, either by
increasing the activity of the naturally
occurring plant phytases and polyphenol
degrading enzymes, or by addition of enzyme
preparations. Biological food processing
techniques that increase the activity of the
native enzymes are soaking, germination,
hydrothermal treatment and fermentation. Food
processing can be optimized towards highest
phytate degradation provided that the optimal
conditions for phytase activity in the plant is
known. In contrast to cereals, some legumes have
highest phytate degradation at neutral or
alkaline pH. Addition of microbial enzyme
preparations seems to be the most efficient for
complete degradation during processing. Fe and
Zn absorption have been shown to be low from
legume-based diets. It has also been
demonstrated that nutritional Fe deficiency
reaches its greatest prevalence in populations
subsisting on cereal- and legume-based diets.
However, in a balanced diet containing animal
protein a high intake of legumes is not
considered a risk in terms of mineral supply.
Furthermore, once phytate, and in certain
legumes polyphenols, is degraded, legumes would
become good sources of Fe and Zn as the content
of these minerals is high.
New
legume sources as therapeutic agents
by
Madar Z.*[1]; Stark A.H.[1]
[*][1]The Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental
Quality Sciences, Institute of Biochemistry,
Food Science and Nutrition, P.O. Box 12,
Rehovot, 76100, Israel
This
review evaluates the potential health benefits
of three legume sources that rarely appear in
Western diets and are often overlooked as
functional foods. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum
graecum) and isolated fenugreek fractions have
been shown to act as hypoglycaemic and
hypocholesterolaemic agents in both animal and
human studies. The unique dietary fibre
composition and high saponin content in
fenugreek appears to be responsible for these
therapeutic properties. Faba beans (Vicia faba)
have lipid-lowering effects and may also be a
good source of antioxidants and chemopreventive
factors. Mung beans (Phaseolus aureus, Vigna
radiatus) are thought to be beneficial as an
antidiabetic, low glycaemic index food, rich in
antioxidants. Evidence suggests that these three
novel sources of legumes may provide health
benefits when included in the daily diet.
Carbohydrate
fractions of legumes: uses in human nutrition
and potential for health
by
Guillon F.*[1]; Champ M.M.-J.[1]
[*][1]URPOI & UFDNH, National
Institute for Agronomic Research (INRA), Rue de
la Géraudière, BP 71627, 44316 Nantes Cedex,
03, France
Starch
and fibre can be extracted, using wet or dry
processes, from a variety of grain legumes and
used as ingredients for food. -Galactosides can
be isolated during wet processes from the
soluble extract. Starch isolates or concentrates
are mostly produced from peas, whereas dietary
fibre fractions from peas and soyabean are
commercially available. The physico-chemical
characteristics of fibre fractions very much
depend on their origin, outer fibres being very
cellulosic whereas inner fibres contain a
majority of pectic substances. Inner fibres are
often used as texturing agents whereas outer
fibres find their main uses in bakery and
extruded products, where they can be introduced
to increase the fibre content of the food. Most
investigations on impacts on health have been
performed on soyabean fibres. When positive
observations were made on lipaemia, glucose
tolerance or faecal excretion, they were
unfortunately often obtained after non-realistic
daily doses of fibres. Legume starches contain a
higher amount of amylose than most cereal or
tuber starches. This confers these starches a
lower bioavailability than that of most starches,
when raw or retrograded. Their low glycaemic
index can be considered as beneficial for health
and especially for the prevention of diseases
related to insulin resistance. When partly
retrograded, these starches can provide
significant amount of butyrate to the colonic
epithelium and may help in colon cancer
prevention. Galactosides are usually considered
as responsible for flatus but their apparent
prebiotic effects may be an opportunity to
valorize these oligosaccharides.
Non-nutrient
bioactive substances of pulses
by
Champ M.M.-J.*[1]
[*][1]National Institute for Agronomic
Research (INRA), Human Nutrition Research
Centre, Rue de la Géraudière, BP 71627, 44316
Nantes, Cedex 03, France
Pulses
supply many bioactive substances found in minor
amounts in food, but which may have significant
metabolic and/or physiological effects. These
compounds have long been classified as
antinutritional factors, but many studies have
reconsidered their impact on health. Some could
play a role in the prevention of the major
diseases of affluent societies. As these
compounds can be beneficial or adverse,
depending on conditions, an assessment of their
various physiological effects is necessary to
determine whether they should be preserved or
eliminated in each main nutritional situation.
|